Home | Classifieds | Place an ad | Obituaries | Public Notices | Galleries | Opinions | Real Estate Search | 928 Media Lab | Contact Us | Subscribe | Yellow Pages
Prescott Valley Tribune | Prescott Valley, Arizona

home : opinions : commentary April 17, 2015


5/29/2013 10:10:00 AM
Commentary
Thomas's abortion argument was incomplete
By Larry Wonderling
Special to the Tribune

When a debate focuses on only half of the argument, it's at best incomplete. That's my primary reason for responding to Cal Thomas's 5/22/13 article entitled "Gosnell Case Reignites Abortion Debate."

I've always enjoyed open debates relevant to differing points of view, provided they're not laced with exaggerations and faulty logic, presented as indisputable facts. As a refresher to Thomas's comments about the abortionist Kermit Gosnell, from what I've read, I agree that Gosnell was apparently a cruel, medically careless, insensitive individual with a criminal disregard for abortion laws or the legal rights of a viable embryo nearing a full term birth. I disagree, however, with Thomas's generalization that somehow all medically trained abortionists are criminals. That's comparable to concluding all police are sadists after witnessing on officer beat a helpless person senseless.

In his searing invective against abortions, Cal Thomas also adds one of his most misleading statements that "...It's the estimated 55 million children, and counting, who are denied their right to live." He also argues that a "woman's right to choose" subverts "a child's right to live." Thomas's arguments seem so imbued with personal opinions dramatized as facts, they tend to distort any logical debate.

In "my opinion" there is no verifiable evidence that a fetus or embryo is an independently functioning individual child until separated from the mother by birth or medically necessary surgery. Labeling all abortionists as murderers and that the right to life begins at conception are other faith-based opinions, not unarguable truths. Another of my opinions based on observations and studies throughout my professional life is the marked mental and physical differences in females and their resultant behaviors.

Similar to so many anti-abortionists, Thomas omits any concern for other highly relevant debate issues: Are all pregnant women mentally and physically ready to deliver and care for an infant? What were the circumstances surrounding the pregnancy? Will a child born to any mother have equal opportunities for reasonable care and development?

Research indicates that many females are incapable of caring for a potential child during pregnancy or after birth. The reasons are endless, including faulty genetic predisposition, family abuse, incest, rape, early teenage pregnancy, drugs, minimal intelligence, or stamina, even a pathological fear or anathema for child rearing.

Other observations might understandably be challenged in a genuine debate about the pregnant woman's sexual complicity, and the adoption alternative to abortion, etc. These are clearly debatable issues; and I would briefly suggest that any anti-abortionists carefully evaluate crude male sexual dominance, especially during early puberty years, and the complexities of adoptions.

Practically any heterosexual women will sooner or later lose her virginity to some loving guy or lecherous stud who won't take no for an answer. The pervasive high school sexual abuses by the athlete who thinks he's entitled to his sexual demands on swooning girls, the thousands of yearly female sexual abuses by our military men, and the incalculable rapes of women all tend to underscore a woman's vulnerable encounters with men that too often result in unwanted pregnancies.

Those obvious individual differences in women's mental and physical abilities, psychosocial opportunities, values, even religious beliefs strongly suggest that many women are simply incapable of wanting a child or motherhood. Giving birth to an unwanted infant by a drug addicted, lone woman from a sexually abusive, dysfunctional family too often is disastrous to any infant born and raised in such an abusive situation. I'm neither for nor against abortions. I'm simply for acknowledging obvious differences in women's abilities and willingness to become a caring, responsible mother.

I image we all have had a few memorable events in our lives that have somehow affected our personal biases. One of mine occurred over forty years ago as a graduate psychology student. It was during an anti-abortion protest at a Planned Parenthood clinic in San Francisco. Women were timidly trying to navigate through the screaming, banner-waving protestors when an ordinary looking young black lady was virtually blocked by a jeering white middle-aged woman who shoved a sign in the young woman's face that read in part "child killer." I felt sorry for this seemingly shy little lady until she opened her mouth. Screaming back at the protestor, her message was crisp and clear: "If you'll pay for all the needs of this baby in my belly until it's 18, and care for it whenever it has any problems, I'll turn around right now and go home. Otherwise get out of my face, b----!"

Dr. Wonderling is a retired clinical and forensic psychologist who has published eight books.

Related Stories:
• Gosnell case reignites abortion debate


    Most Viewed     Recently Commented
•   Man allegedly fires shots at javelina in Fain Park (201 views)

•   Theater on the Green event dazzles (192 views)

•   Enterprise Parkway, multi-use path on target for future connectivity (161 views)

•   Growing Prescott Valley population may garner more state shared revenues (149 views)

•   Darn! No million dollar antiques at Roadshow (148 views)





Article Comment Submission Form
Comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to our Use of Service Terms of Use agreement. Rambling or nonsensical comments may not be posted. Comments are limited to Facebook character limits. In order for us to reasonably manage this feature we may limit excessive comment entries.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Required
Last Name:
Required
Telephone:
Required
Email:
Required
Comment:
Required
Passcode:
Required
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.
   


Advanced Search

HSE - We want to hear from you


Find It Features Blogs Milestones Extras Submit Other Publications Local Listings
Classifieds | Place an ad | Public Notices | Galleries | Opinions | Real Estate Search | Contact Us | Subscribe | e-newsletter | RSS | Site Map
© Copyright 2015 Prescott Newspapers, Inc. The Prescott Valley Tribune is the information source for Prescott Valley area communities in Northern Arizona. Original content may not be reprinted or distributed without the written permission of Prescott Newspapers, Inc. Prescott Newspapers Online is a service of Prescott Newspapers, Inc. By using the Site, pvtrib.com ®, you agree to abide and be bound by the Site's terms of use and Privacy Policy, which prohibit commercial use of any information on the Site. Click here to submit your questions, comments or suggestions. Prescott Newspapers Online is a proud publication of Western News&Info Inc.® All Rights Reserved.

Software © 1998-2015 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved