Home | Classifieds | Place an ad | Obituaries | Public Notices | Galleries | Opinions | Real Estate Search | 928 Media Lab | Contact Us | Subscribe
Prescott Valley Tribune | Prescott Valley, Arizona

home : opinions : opinions February 6, 2016


2/13/2013 11:59:00 AM
Letter: Response to last week's letters

Editor:

Every week, one of the first things I look for is the Letters section. It's interesting to me finding out what my fellow residents feel strongly enough to write in about, even if they don't strike a responsive cord in me. This week, though, I just have to respond!

First, a quote. "Scratch a conservative and you'll find someone who prefers the past to any possible future. Scratch a liberal and you'll find a closet aristocrat." Leto II Atreides: The Stolen Chronicles

I'd like to agree with Curtis Allen that the Second Amendment has no gray areas, but then in the middle of his letter he starts offering up exceptions!

"No one endorses..." Bear in mind that the privately owned artillery pieces and bulk gun power of the revolutionary war period qualified as WMDs for that era. The key words are "keep and bear" meaning "own and carry," "arms" an unrestricted reference to any type of weapon, and "shall not be infringed" which, I submit, every single one of the 20,000 plus anti-gun laws currently on the books, at all levels of government, violates!

Donald Huard has missed the point that every single appointment to the Supreme Court has been politically motivated, and thus even laws that "the Supremes" give the nod too can still be unconstitutional. Otherwise, please explain to me such travesties as "Dred Scott."

Ray Newton, in his letter about SANE legislation has obviously forgotten (or never cared enough to learn) that the titles lawmakers give their bills are almost invariably designed to mislead their fellow congress critters as to what is actually in the bill, while relying on the fact that so many bills are proposed every session that no one can possibly read the whole thing before the vote comes up! Anything that sounds as good as he makes this out to be has to be too good to be true. Forget the name they give it and read the fine print.

Finally, Cathy Severson makes a good point, but doesn't take it far enough. I'm personally of the opinion that every girl, at menarche, should receive a five-year implant. This would accomplish several things. 1. No unwanted "children having children" pregnancies. (If she marries young, the implant can be removed, at her option). 2. Since it's a one-time doctor visit, the girl doesn't have the daily (or every three months, or whatever) reminder that she doesn't have to "worry about it." 3. Since they offer no immunity to STDs, some form of "safe sex" or "abstinence" education is still needed. 4. By the time the first implant is ready to be removed, she's old enough to to make intelligent choices about her own body. I call this responsible parenting!

And, yes, I did. I raised two daughters. One is now 29, married with one child, and the other is 27, still single, with no children. And neither of them ever had a problem with STDs, although a number of their classmates, in both middle and high school, did have unwanted pregnancies, STD's or both.

James A Turner

SSgt USMC(ret)

Prescott Valley


    Most Viewed     Recently Commented
•   Bradshaw ready to compete for students (481 views)

•   University leaves Prescott Valley (378 views)

•   PV schools earn bragging rights (290 views)

•   Starbucks among new businesses near Kohl's (280 views)

•   Prescott Valley closes Fain Park (277 views)





Article Comment Submission Form
Comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to our Use of Service Terms of Use agreement. Rambling or nonsensical comments may not be posted. Comments are limited to Facebook character limits. In order for us to reasonably manage this feature we may limit excessive comment entries.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Required
Last Name:
Required
Telephone:
Required
Email:
Required
Comment:
Required
Passcode:
Required
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.
   


Advanced Search

HSE - We want to hear from you
Find more about Weather in Prescott Valley, AZ
Click for weather forecast


Find It Features Blogs Milestones Extras Submit Other Publications Local Listings
Classifieds | Place an ad | Public Notices | Galleries | Opinions | Real Estate Search | Contact Us | Subscribe | e-newsletter | RSS | Site Map
© Copyright 2016 Prescott Newspapers, Inc. The Prescott Valley Tribune is the information source for Prescott Valley area communities in Northern Arizona. Original content may not be reprinted or distributed without the written permission of Prescott Newspapers, Inc. Prescott Newspapers Online is a service of Prescott Newspapers, Inc. By using the Site, pvtrib.com ®, you agree to abide and be bound by the Site's terms of use and Privacy Policy, which prohibit commercial use of any information on the Site. Click here to submit your questions, comments or suggestions. Prescott Newspapers Online is a proud publication of Western News&Info Inc.® All Rights Reserved.

Software © 1998-2016 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved